26 April 2012

A session with Yalom - Part 3

Click here for Part 1 and here for Part 2


It was damp everywhere from the recent downpour and the chair outside was wet. The home office was of modest size and elegant looking with a pretty garden.

Right on 12:30 the door opened and there stood Irv. I went inside and moved towards the fairly old and comfortable looking armchairs. The home office was a pleasing space with a relaxing feel about it, although I was far from relaxed. I was quite nervous which is probably the first thing I said to Irv.

We sat down and I registered the box of tissues on the table. Then we started. There followed just shy of an hour of interaction with one of my favourite authors and someone for whom I have great respect and admiration. I laughed and I cried.

Now, what follows is not a blow-by-blow account of all that passed between Irv and I. I did record the session with Irv’s kind permission.  In retrospect I am so glad that I did as on listening back I could hear things that Irv said that I clearly did not hear at the time.  A lot of what was discussed is very personal and intimate but there were some general issues that we talked about which I think that others could get some value from hearing.

How did I find Irvin? – Well, he speaks like he writes – intelligently and authoritatively, but I found him warmer than I imagined and his voice softer. He asked me a lot of questions to begin with, about my childhood, children, relationship history. I am not used to being led like this, but of course, this was a one-off session; I appreciate that he was gathering information, at quite a rate, which he later deftly wove into the session in an insightful and ultimately helpful way.

Near the start of the session I brought up the authenticity issue. Rather than an intellectual discussion of semantics and philosophy, which is what I was angling at, Irv kept it where it belonged:

Amanda: My lifelong quest is to try and find out what authenticity is, and that seems to be at the bottom of a lot of my ‘stuff’, and I have a fear that there is no such thing and that as humans we are very good at using our logic to justify our actions. I find that quite a scary concept. And I know that I, as a human being yearn for connection with others.

Irv: Can you just say a little bit to me about why authenticity is particularly important to you? How do you relate to the concept of authenticity?

Amanda: I know how easy it is to lie. Lying makes me feel uncomfortable whether it’s me doing it or someone else.

Irv: Do you have a history of that? Is it a particularly common experience…?

Amanda: I suppose I’ve been let down a lot, historically, been misled. I know that we’re surrounded by lies on a societal level.

Irv: On a societal…what about a personal level?

Amanda: On a personal level, yes, and that’s….I know there’s a yearning for connection…

From that point the topic of authenticity remained on a personal level. I think that Irvin had to steer me away from a cognitive and philosophical discussion to the personal. These issues are important to me for a reason and talking my way philosophically around them does not actually get to the root of it – me. I know this when I’m with a client and I bring them to the level of  their experience rather than an external level. It was very interesting for me to listen afterwards to my subconscious attempts to take it away from me, to the safer, bigger world of outside-of-me. I hope that I am as gentle with clients as Irv was with me at steering me back to me!

He complimented me on being on this journey with  3 kids (including a teenager – one who happens to verbally challenge my stereotype-generalisation of teenagers – good for him!) and us getting on well – a journey which he knows many have undertaken, with kids, including himself, and which he understands is usually a harrowing experience.

He was very kind and helpful in pointing out the good that I have done with my life, despite certain setbacks, and pressed that I had successfully broken the cycle (he had to press as I just wasn’t taking it on board, and, indeed, it was only on hearing the recording that I finally heard it properly!). So I got a lot out of that.

Irv asked about my counselling work and I took the opportunity to ask about one of my themes:

Amanda: Is it an authentic healing process or do we subconsciously pass on our construct resulting in the client taking on a similar construct? 

Irv: That’s a good question. They’re taking on what you give them and they have to see it in the light of their own internal language. They build it again inside of them to fit with their own past experiences. I’ve never had the feeling that people take on my construct. But they build a new one because their whole life circumstances are so very different. And for you, you will get certain things from seeing me or seeing your therapist… and other people won’t do it that way, they’ll take other things. Everyone deals with it quite differently. So I think, my only feeling is you really just have to be present with your clients and give them what you can, and trust them to take what they need out of it.

This was great for me to hear as for me it is being present with the client that seems to work best. I shared with Irv that I think that therapy is about the relationship I form with a client, and they see that I actually feel love for them, that they perceive that somehow.

Irv:  They have a capacity then to form a really good relationship once in their life at least or be with someone who can actually love them. Well, that gives them an internal reference point, they know they’ll be able to do that again, and will keep you in mind a lot. I think that’s really important.

The session then turned again to more personal issues – of course those issues are part of who I am and  I was grateful to explore in the greater context of the situation – meeting my hero and receiving his wisdom.

We talked about my disappointment at his cancellation and my discomfort around being less important to him than he was to me. Referring to what he had gleaned about my childhood experiences, he seemed to really empathise about why this might be particularly difficult for me. I really felt that he had a lot of understanding of what it must be to be me.

I asked Irvin what he got out of what he does:

Irv: A great deal. First of all, the same things you’re saying. It’s important for me and it gives me a sense of meaning in my life, to be able to work with people and give them some meaning as well. The other thing is, and I think this may be true for you as well, is that I feel that I’m pretty good at this, I know what I’m doing. And I think you do have a bit of that also, and you know, it feels good when you do something you’re being really effective in, so there’s that. There’s something about the whole intimate connection , even though it’s very brief, it is always warming to me. There’s something about, I like to get into the lives of other people, to their stories. Maybe as a writer there’s some of that for me too...its not their story but it’s an idea…ignites in my heart.

Amanda: That’s interesting that you say that because you get ideas for the stories you write and you like getting into other people’s lives and stories and I do feel a little bit guilty about that…hearing other people’s secrets…I feel so privileged but also, a bit…not scared, but in awe of the fact that I’m in that privileged position and that they trust me that much.

Irvin then referred to a paragraph he wrote in his book “The Gift of Therapy”, which I have reproduced here as it is a poignant and important point for therapists:

“We are cradlers of secrets. Every day patients grace us with their secrets, often never before shared. Receiving such secrets is a privilege to the very few. The secrets provide a backstage view of the human condition without social frills, role playing, bravado or stage posturing…Those who are cradlers of secrets are granted a clarifying lens through which to view the world – a view with less distortion, denial, and illusion, a view of the way things really are.”

With that in mind, I can see why, with my lifelong quest for authenticity,  I find my work so rewarding. And if I can help anybody feel as content and passionate about life as I do, then it is with purpose.

On reflection, something else incredibly valuable I have gained from this session, is that my thoughts around therapist self-disclosure have been solidified. There are many, wildly differing opinions about the appropriateness and usefulness of therapist self-disclosure. One of the things that attracts me to Yalom is the honesty he reveals in his writing and in session with him I felt I knew enough about him to feel comfortable with him. His honesty about his shortcomings and humanness put me at ease before I even met him.

I have, since starting private practice, decided to be as upfront as I can about myself and my approach in my marketing literature. Anyone familiar with my blogs will see that I reveal a lot more in my posts than many other counsellors do. The reason why I do this is that I want people to have a flavour of who I am and what they can expect – what makes me different to other counsellors, rather than what makes me the same. The aim is to give the client real choice – to enter into a therapeutic relationship with me with open eyes. Now, post-Irv, I have real experience of the benefits of knowing something about the therapist beforehand. 

My thoughts throughout have included the relationship I have with my own therapist. Indeed, it was he who recommended Yalom's books to me when I was first training. From my point of view I have a safe, trusting and wonderful relationship with him. After the session, I couldn't help but compare him to Yalom, and would say he is at least as good. In fact, I would always choose my therapist when I reflect on what we have shared, how I have grown through my relationship with him, and because he is who he is.

The session with Yalom taught me a lot about myself, and my work. The personal development began long before the appointment itself and continues, as the session becomes a memory, and I ponder on what we discussed, and integrate it into the present.

Most important, of course, is that Irvin Yalom is still one of my heroes.

A final point - I strongly urge anybody involved in or interested in the counselling and psychotherapy profession to read Yalom’s non-fiction works, and for everybody to read his fictional works.



With thanks to Irvin Yalom for his kind permission to include quotes from the session and the excerpt from his book.


25 April 2012

A session with Yalom - Part 2



A Session with Yalom Part 2

We covered a lot of miles on our journey – over 3000. I had a lot of thinking time, and sure enough, as we drove through mountains, past huge lakes, through deserts, some thoughts did start to formulate. I wrote down notes in the car (which I can barely read).  Some of the themes of fears and insecurities for me that were brewing were:

Authenticity – what is it really? Is everything an illusion? Is our logic and our rationality a tool with which we justify our actions?

Connection – what is the source of our yearning for connection? Conception in the product of union; being born is the ultimate divide. Is love a construct to attempt to gain the approximation of the togetherness of gestation? And is death, therefore, sweet relief from the inevitable lifelong pain and yearning?

The process of counselling/psychotherapy – is it an authentic, healing process or is it a construct to make the therapist feel better? Do we subconsciously pass on our construct resulting in the client taking on a similar construct leading to them feeling better because we have passed on our way of coping with existence? Do we help clients replace “unhealthy” and dysfunctional constructs with more workable and life-enhancing constructs?

Freedom and choice – It feels to me like we have a choice and I operate from that level. But I also feel that there’s something bigger than me (fate, destiny, chance…) that has resulted in my capabilities of choice. I struggle with understanding how others do not see it the same way.

Childhood “stuff” – just thinking about bringing some old, personal issues into the session had me feeling nauseous. Such a strong reaction showed me that I should perhaps not avoid this topic. After all that cognitive stuff above, this was a gut reaction to old pain. Do I really want to revisit when it’s all behind me? Well,  who better to entrust it with?

All along the lead up to the session, I had a background fear that Irv would get sick and cancel. I did not dwell on it – I did not want to send negative vibes out into the stratosphere (how grounded does that sound?!), so I allowed myself some excitement of the anticipation, but it was safely contained, should the worst happen. Coincidentally(?) my daughter brought up one of her deep thoughts for all to share, during our journey, such is the gift that she is, which I wrote down in my notes:

“It is better to not be too happy because if you are, and things go wrong, it feels worse than if you were just a bit happy”.

We talked about this for a while and I told her that I think that sad and bad things are part of life, and that curtailing happiness won’t stop them from happening, and that embracing the happiness makes the most of it while we have it, making the bad things easier to tolerate when they happen. Whether I manage to do that myself is something I am unsure of. I am closer to it, and in this instance I did allow myself some excitement, but yes, it was “safe” excitement.

So, on the morning of the appointment, in a hotel in Sunnyvale, close to Palo Alto where the appointment was to be, I woke up excited and ready. After breakfast, I decided to check my emails and there it was, a profuse apology from Irvin that he had woken in the night feeling terribly sick. I felt crushed, and quite numb. All that build up, all that supposedly safely contained excitement and I was gutted. He mentioned that if he made a miraculous recovery maybe I could see him the next day, but what’s the chances of that? My colds/flu are always worse on the second day.

I knew it. It wasn’t going to happen. My husband and kids were so disappointed for me – they were more visible about it than I was. I numbly got on with the day as we changed our plans and went to Monterey, in the pouring rain, early. The Facebook responses to my disappointment were helpful – so thank you to my friends and family for your empathy.

Because there was a small chance of a miraculous recovery, I did not allow my disappointment to flow freely. I protected myself from the depth of emotion and saved it for when I knew it was definitely over. We had a bit of a downer of a day – it rained continually the entire day, the forecast was for pure rain  within a 5hr radius of Monterey (indeed, the whole of California) for the rest of our time in the States, and the visit to Monterey Aquarium was disappointing. We have been spoiled with Plymouth Aquarium, and I had visited Sydney Aquarium 17 years ago, with which Monterey is supposedly on par. Well, it just wasn’t that great, after the huge build up and misleading brochure. Also, the kids were beginning to feel really homesick

That night I decided to do some believing in the reality I wanted (I have been reading Joe Dispenza’s Break the Habit Of Being Yourself which goes on about Quantum Fields and creating new realities). So I pictured waking up to a sunny sky and a message from Irv. I imagined the experience of this being so and fell asleep…


So I awoke to sunshine, but no message from Irv. I decided to email him and find out if it was a possibility, so I could get on with the process of expressing my huge disappointment (which was still on hold), then get on with the rest of the trip. The act of writing the email brought up a lot of feelings for me. I realised how much this meant to me and I had uncomfortable feelings around that. I felt anger towards Irv for being ill, and for the fact that this was way more important to me than it was to him:

“Hi Irv, I am sorry to bother you, particularly if you are still feeling very ill. We are making our plans for the day and I was just checking in the faint hope whether there was any chance for a reschedule today… If there is any chance I would be most grateful, and yet I feel uncomfortable being in the situation where I am this desperately hopeful and dependant upon circumstances and somebody else. This is very complex. Regardless of the outcome I guess I have stuff to take away to process. Anyway, an update would be good.”

Why was this so difficult for me to write?

Well, anyway, I'm glad I did as I got an email from Irv telling me he was feeling better and would 12:30 be okay. Unbelievable. By now we were about an hour and a half away. My husband and kids were really pleased for me, even though it involved disrupting their day. So off we went.

At 12:25 I arrived at Irvin’s home office and waited a few minutes outside, feeling very excited, very nervous and ready to go.


Click here for Part 3

17 April 2012

A session with Yalom - Part 1


I think that everybody that knows me is aware of the fact that I met somebody I greatly admire last week, and how much it meant to me. I knew before I did it that I would want to blog about the experience. Maybe it's the jetlag (I've been back for 3 days, and was 8 hours behind GMT), but I have been flummoxed as to what to write. So, I have kicked off with a precursor. I fear my self-indulgent blathering might greatly bore anybody but the most ardent Yalom fan, and if you wish to go straight to the session itself, click the link to Part 3. Here goes...


Why do it?

While planning our recent trip to the States, it occurred to me that the world famous psychotherapist and author Irvin Yalom practices in San Francisco. I have read most of his books and he has had a great influence on the way I practice. He is a source of inspiration and I regard him as one of my (few, select) heroes.

He writes fiction as well as non-fiction. His non-fiction works are far from stale, dry textbooks. He breathes life into them by using himself, as much as his anonymous case studies, as examples. In particular, I appreciate his honesty and transparency about his own flaws. He is intelligent, creative, wise, human and lacking in arrogance.

Irvin Yalom switched me on to my own existential slant on life. I am aware that as a very young child I spent hours (at least if felt like hours) thinking about what it is like to be another, how we are unable to get into other people's heads, that we all have our own version of reality based upon how we perceive. I brooded on life, death, purpose, loneliness - which Yalom cites as common human concerns. As I grew out of childhood I learned that this was all way more complex than I was capable of understanding - in fact, I see getting older as a positive thing in that I can get closer to understanding what reality is, or at least, what reality isn't.

When I trained in my Diploma in Integrative Counselling, my favourite module was that on existential therapy. Indeed, I would definitely say that existential therapy is a substantial part of my approach. The main part of my approach, however, is my emphasis on the quality of the relationship between the client and myself. Yalom describes himself as working from "an interpersonal and existential frame of reference" which is close to where I am, approach wise. I describe myself as person-centred with an emphasis on relational depth, underpinned with an existential frame of reference. The person-centred approach, much as it is debased with fluffy overtones by those that do not understand how challenging it can be, if embraced fully, closely matches my way of being in a therapeutic relationship.

So, back to Yalom. Much of what he writes speaks to me in my language - it inspires me and I feel sets therapists free in that he shows how our imperfections, and how we deal with them, are valuable to our clients. It's okay not to be perfect - it's what we do with mistakes that can actually enhance learning. Yalom writes in such a convincing way, with such authority. A true wiseman.

His works of fiction are outstanding. I abhor most fiction and find it lifeless and dull. It is very hard to convince me to believe in and care for a character. There is almost always something implausible about how they speak,  dress, or, usually, relate to others. This is where Yalom triumphs. His characters are deep, complex and utterly convincing. The first novel I read, When Nietzsche Wept, had me gripped throughout. He deftly weaves a fictional tale based on two real characters - the philosopher Nietzsche and, the layer of the foundations of psychotherapy, Josef Breuer. These characters did not meet in real life but what is written is a fictional account of the development of a therapeutic relationship between these two influential and pivotal men. It is utterly convincing and I was sobbing like a good 'un by the end of the book.

He has also written a novel "Lying on the Couch" - described by my friend Robin as "the best counselling book ever" (with which I wholeheartedly agree). It is a book which traverses the truly complex nature of therapy with themes such as sex, gambling, corruption and morality. There are no black and white messages, in fact, there is no message. It is a reflection on how life is - full of grey areas and agonising decisions on whether we need to justify our behaviour and responses. No easy answers here - and that's what I love about it. There is also "The Schopenhauer Cure" - a fictional account of a therapy group. The same applies - grey areas, no goodies and baddies. Just 3-dimensional people - flaws and all. A great, convincing ending too (possibly not to everybody's taste though). I am eager to read his new novel "The Spinoza Problem".

So, when it occurred to me that I could in theory meet the man, and perhaps engage in a therapeutic session with possibly the world's most famous (living) psychotherapist - I decided that I had to at least enquire.

The request

I attempted to capture Yalom's attention by writing in my individual and honest style. I was upfront about why I wanted to meet . Here are a couple of excerpts from that email. I have not included it in it's entirety as some is very private. I sent this last July:

"I am attracted to the honesty you reveal in your writing. From what I can glean from The Gift of Therapy - you are able to authentically express yourself in the therapeutic relationship. I enjoy the way you dare to tread in the grey areas - crossing the boundaries that therapists can cling onto due to their own fears. I see myself as being intrepid and would rather face the discomfort of honesty than the safety of the cocoon of collusion....


So, I hit 40 next year. It's just a number, and it hasn't got anything to do with anything...except, it's a great excuse to do something I REALLY want to do. By chance, partially thanks to my recently revisited (yet again) Death Anxiety, the grave reminder that life is too short, I am coming to America next Spring with my family. We are going to blow a modest inheritance on seeing things we really want to see - Yellowstone, Grand Canyon, Lake Tahoe, Death Valley, Redwood forests etc etc and part of the trip will be driving up to San Francisco...


We will be travelling in the area around the second week of April next year. Is there any chance of us arranging anything? I have fears around this...what if you don't read this or get back to me? What if you do, and we arrange something, and I get all excited, then you have to cancel? What if something happens on our trip and I don't make it? What if we meet and it is a disappointing and empty experience? This is me putting myself out of my comfort zone."


I feared that I would not hear anything back at all, or that I would have to wait a long time. However, I received an email the following day, saying that it was certainly a possibility and that I should contact him nearer the time.


I was thrilled! Part of me was certain that fate would interfere and it would not happen, but I was delighted to have received a response from "Irv".

I did contact him at a later date and secured an appointment which would fit in with our travel plans - well, we worked our travel plans around what was available. Fortunately, my very understanding partner rates Yalom very highly as an author and knew how important it was to me

Many people balked at the amount I was willing to pay, however, some did, on reflection, say that they would probably be willing to do likewise, considering who it was. Regardless, it was worth it to me - for personal and professional development.

Then all there was to do was to wait. In the meantime I was frequently asked "what are you going to talk to him about?". But I made the conscious decision to wait and see what came up for me. Shortly prior to the trip, I was devoid of any issues I specifically wanted to take to Irv, but that changed once the trip commenced.

Click here for part 2



12 March 2012

Current reading matter...

I always seem to have a few books on the go. They are mostly books on psychotherapy/counselling/philosophy and looking at the pile beside the bed, my current selection is in keeping with my norm.


The current favourite (that is, the one I am most excited about) is Joe Dispenza's latest offering "Breaking the Habit of Being Yourself - How to Lose Your Mind and Create a New One". I find the title slightly harsh, but I appreciate his sentiment. I very much enjoyed his previous book "Evolve Your Brain" and did a presentation pretty much based on his work. He draws from neuroscience, biochemistry and quantum physics to describe how our minds work and the influence we can have on making our minds work for us, rather than falling back on ancient, hardwired "survival"strategies to get by in life. Fascinating stuff. This book seems to be a more user friendly version of the first book and has much more about meditation and mindfulness as a way of braintraining, describing the neuroscience behind why what he is saying actually works. I have only just started it and will blog a review on it when I am done.

There is also a copy of The Way of Zen by the British philosopher Alan Watts - given to me by my friend Robin who is a huge fan of Watts. It is a marvellous book, in that, so far, it seems to be able to communicate some of the trickier concepts of Zen Buddhism and Eastern thought, or at least, I think it does. It is tricky to read as it challenges the Western perceptions which are part of my psyche via nature and nurture.  I need peace and quiet and a lot of focus to finish this one.






I adore the neorologist Oliver Sacks' writing and have had "A Leg to Stand On" by my bed, on and off, for years now. The book, which is about the author's recovery from a nasty accident involving his leg, is not as fascinating to me as his other stories. One of my favourite books of all time is his "The Man Who Mistook his Wife for a Hat". I will get around to finishing A Leg to Stand on one of these days....






There's always a text book in there. The current text - and the book which I am getting through at a greater rate than the others, is "Skills in Existential Counselling and Psychotherapy" by Emmy Van Deurzen and Martin Adams. This was recommended to me by my therapist, who has a similar approach to me in counselling, i.e. person-centred with existential traits. It is a very straightforward description of what it means to practice therapy with an existential approach. It makes perfect sense to me, but maybe that's because it speaks to me in my language. I highly recommend it for trainee counsellors, particularly if the training involves a module on existential therapy.

Lined up for me, ready to read after finishing Skills in Existential Counselling, is Yalom's weighty tome "Existential Therapy" which, apparently, is a great read for anybody interested in human existence. I am looking forward to reading this and Yalom is without doubt one of my favourite authors. He writes both fiction and non-fiction exquisitely.

Finally, a little bit of fiction. I have a book of short stories which I have had for some time, but took a break from. I am ready to dip back into it (it is a huge book of short stories). It is called "Songs of the Dying Earth" and is a collection of stories written by various authors in honour of sci-fi author Jack Vance. His specialised genre was called "Dying Earth" which is about the future of humanity, when the sun is dying. Very existential. I also managed to acquire a copy with the beautiful illustrated jacket.

 I have always been fascinated with the concept of the end of the world since reading, when I was about 10, that the sun was going to expand and fry the Earth in 100 billion years, then retreat and leave the Earth cold, lifeless and desolate (I think that science has changed it's mind slightly on this one). The sci-fi sub-genre of Dying Earth was introduced by H G Wells in his novel "The Time Machine" where the time traveller goes forward in time to find the earth virtually inhabitable. This was left out of the original print as it was deemed too scary for the general public. I must admit that I find the concept extremely haunting and it stirs a little anxiety in me.  It also makes me appreciate what I've got what right now, while I've got it.

27 February 2012

The Compassionate Mind - you really are worth it





"How to use compassion to develop happiness, self-acceptance and well-being"









I read this book last month, having requested it for a Christmas gift. It came highly recommended to me by a fellow workshop attendee (on a Heart Intelligence workshop run by Gill Wyatt). I had a conversation with this man afterwards and we talked about a stumbling block in intimate relationships - how can we truly love others if we don't love ourselves? He had attended a course in Compassion Focused Therapy developed by Paul Gilbert and suggested I look into it.


It has been a theme for me recently - true acceptance of all facets of myself. This is something that I endeavour to help clients move towards and it is my belief that one cannot help at the fundamental level required in therapy, if one runs away from one's own issues, paticularly if they are pertinent to current client work.


So whilst I thought that I truly accept all facets of myself this was put strictly to the test at the end of last year. Some very old issues were brought abruptly to my awareness and it became apparent that there was still some work to do. What could be viewed as a horrible experience became a gift for me as it allowed me to focus on an area requiring growth and happened at a time that I was equipped to deal with it. Although I knew cognitively that I was essentially a good person worthy of love and compassion (huge growth from how I considered myself in my earlier years), there was some kind of blockage to fully integrating that belief. It is hard to articulate in a way which makes sense and, indeed, each client has their own unique way of describing the feeling of knowing something in one's head and knowing it in one's heart. Sometimes, fortunately very infrequently, my belief in myself was challenged and recognising the past experiences that caused that to be the case was not enough to shift it. Hence, psychoanalysis, in my opinion, is not enough. It is in the relationship where the client experiences compassion that fundamental shifts can occur.


Part of my growth involved reading this book. The blurb on the back of the book states:


"In societies that encourage us to compete with each other, compassion is often seen as a weakness. Striving to get ahead, self-criticism, fear and hostility towards others seem to come more naturally to us. The Compassionate Mind explains the evolutionary and social reasons why our brains react so readily to threats - and reveals how our brains are also hardwired to respond to kindness and compassion.


Research has found that developing kindness and compassion for ourselves and others builds our confidence, helps us create meaningful, caring relationships and promotes physical and mental health. Far from fostering emotional weakness, practical exercises focusing on developing compassion have been found to subdue our anger and increase our courage and resilience to depression and anxiety."


Well, I would say that the book does indeed give a great explanation as to the evolutionary issue with our minds - explaning why we have emotions and describing the glitches in the construction of our emotional selves. I have believed for some time that one of the first tasks in therapy is to take away the shame associated with the unwanted way of being e.g. somebody gets angry frequently, and they feel a deep sense of shame or guilt for doing so. The problem with this is that shame or guilt makes the whole package harder to manage - take away the shame and then we can pick apart what is behind the anger. So reading the science behind our emotions can really help us to be more understanding of our reactions and responses, instead of getting bogged down with shame and guilt.


Gilbert describes our three different affect regulation systems (the incentive/resource focused, the non-wanting/affiliative focused and the threat-focused) and how they compete with one another - that it is not in our physiology to be in all three modes at once. "...many negative emotions such as anxiety, anger, disgust and sadness are a normal part of our emotional repertoire...These emotions evolved to help us detect and cope with threats, but in our society, obsessed as it is with happiness, we sometimes feel that, if we experience them to any degree, there's something wrong with us...our brains did not evolve for happiness but for survival and reproduction, so we need to learn to accept, tolerate and work with difficult emotions or low moods." 


There are exercises designed to help promote self-compassion but I appreciate Gilbert's stance that reading a book is not enough to do this. He talks about talking therapies and the part therapists can play in helping one to develop self-compassion. "Psychotherapies should help people recognise the reality of "alternative constructions" and help them to explore the ones that are more conducive to their health and well-being. Therapists can support people as they embark on this potentially destabilizing process of literally "changing their minds"". I saw my therapist for a few sessions to deal with my recent glitch and it actually helped me to solidify my belief in what I am doing for other people through my work. There is no cure-all fix. Existence is challenging and we sometimes need help to deal with it. Beating ourselves up for not being happy all the time is a sure way of making life even harder. Sometimes we need a helping hand and I, a counsellor, sometimes need a helping hand too.


I love this analogy of anger and hatred: "...both like a flame - it can cast light, give life-sustaining warmth, inspire and create passion but, unchecked and undirected, can also burn, cause intense pain and consume and turn to ash all that it touches. Anger and hatred should be seen as pointers, telling us to look back and find the source of our hurt and to be honest about our fear. In compassion-focused work, this is often the hardest thing to do, to be honest enough to work with the fear and grief that sits underneath anger." For many of us it is easier to project the hurt outwards and blame others, which serves us no favours. "You made me cross" - Gilbert illustrates another way "We can acknowledge openly that we have a brain that has systems for anger and second, notice when those sytems have been triggered. Since these feelings can sweep through us so quickly, it can be difficult to get hold of them; they can take control of us very easily. Now they were designed by evolution to do that, so this is not our fault. Given that it's untrue and unhelpful to tell ourselves that we're bad for feeling anger, when evolution has made it so easy to feel! It's also unhelpful to tell ourselves that we should not be angry when we are. Self-condemning will only make us depressed and/or more irritable". I have heard depression described as anger turned inwards.


There is also a good section on anxiety and, besides trauma and loss, I would say that the majority of my clients come for help with anger or anxiety issues.


I earmarked so much of this book and I was excited by so much of what is being said. I have given just a taster of what is covered. I would recommend this book to anyone, except perhaps my dear friend Robin who I think is already there.

Amanda Williamson Counselling in Exeter




Total Pageviews

Ebuzzing - Top Blogs - Health